year 4, Issue 1 (Spring & Summer 2018)                   CIAUJ 2018, 4(1): 27-40 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghasri M A, Mirgholami M, Hojjat E. An Analysis of Visiting Users’ Readings of the Relation between Form and Symbolism in Different Types of Contemporary Mosques in Tabriz based on Shiite Jurisprudential Decrees. CIAUJ. 2018; 4 (1) :27-40
URL: http://ciau-tabriziau.ir/article-1-215-en.html
1- Tabriz Islamic Art University
2- Tehran University
Abstract:   (245 Views)
The contemporary theoretical literature seems to be characterized by a lack of focus on reading architec­tural works, in particular, visiting users’ readings of contemporary Iranian mosques. The mosque, as an important symbol of the Iranian-Islamic architecture, endows the field with a special sensitivity. In our ex­ploration of visiting users’ readings from the per­spective of form and symbolism as the central focus of the present study, we consider the mosque as a structure composed of form, meaning, apparent manifestations and abstract concepts. Today, for various reasons, we are witness to the emergence of mosques whose users lack a shared understanding of them. Therefore, an analysis of how visiting users read an architectural structure and the factors af­fecting the reading can help clarify this process. It can also help us provide effective strategies for de­signing mosques with divine symbols whose refer­ences/meanings can be optimally read or deci­phered, by the average visiting user. The present study is a fundamental research with practical objec­tives and it features a descriptive-analytical design in terms of its general approach and procedures. First, we developed a model for reading contemporary mosques through a review of literature and a survey of experts’ viewpoints. We used the model as the basis of inclusion into the field study. Then, we eval­uated and compared visiting users’ readings of nine cases selected from among 180 contemporary mosques in Tabriz as located on a spectrum of simi­larity/dissimilarity to traditional mosques. Question­naires, interviews and observation were used to collect the required data. The results showed that, in addition to apparent and symbolic elements such as domes and minarets, abstract concepts such as peace of mind and spirituality play an important role in the reading of contemporary mosques. It seems that Shiite jurisprudential decrees, as our criteria for analyzing user readings, include certain principles for evaluating some of the elements involved in reading such as style, patterns, embellishments, minarets and altars. Although some important elements in the reading of Iranian mosques – including but not limited to domes, porches and forecourts – cannot be evaluated with the above-mentioned criteria, they are necessary for a better read­ing/understanding of the meanings associated with contemporary mosques due to their recurrence and assimilation in the historical course of the evolution of mosques.
Full-Text [PDF 1079 kb]   (105 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |

References
1. Bemanian, Mohammad Reza, Mohammad Reza PourJafar, Feryal Ahmadi, and Alireza Sadeghi. 2010. Reflection of spiritual identity and sacred notions in the architecture of Shi'i mosques. Shiite Studies Quarterly 30: 37–70. [in Persian]
2. Bolkhari Qehi, Hassan. 2009. The cosmological position of the circle and square in the sacred architecture. Honar-ha-ye Ziba Journal 24: 5–14. [in Persian]
3. Dabbagh, Amir Massoud, and Seyyed Mostafa Mokhtabad Emraei. 2013. A new framework for reading of contemporary Tehran mosques. Tehran: Naqsh Jahan Journal 4(2): 22–35. [in Persian]
4. Ebrahimi Dinani, Gholam Hossein .2000. The advent of philosophical thought in the Muslim world. Tehran: Tarheh No. [in Persian]
5. Falahat, Mohammad sadegh. 2004. The role of physical layout in sense of place: A comparison between sense of place of five contemporary mosques and traditional & innovative design in Tehran. PhD Diss. University of Tehran. [in Persian]
6. Falamaki, Mohammad Mansour. 2012. Principals and reading in Iranian architecture. Tehran: Faza Publishing. [in Persian]
7. Grabar, Oleg. 1973. Formation of Islamic art. Translated by Mehrdad Vahdati Daneshmand. 2000. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. [in Persian]
8. Groat, Linda N., and David Wang. 2002. Architectural research methods. Translated by Alireza Einifar. 2005. Tehran: University of Tehran . [in Persian]
9. Hamzehnejad, Mehdi. 2011. Conceptual and applied principles in designing religious buildings in Shia attitudes. PhD Diss. Iran University of Science and Technology. [in Persian]
10. Javadi Amoli, Abdullah. 2009. Tafsir-e-Taasnim. Qom: Publication of Asra. [in Persian]
11. Lang, Jon T. 1987. Creating architectural theory: The role of behavioral sciences in environmental design. Translated by Alireza Eynifar. 2004. Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]
12. Movazaf Rostami, Mohammad Ali, Soheil Soheyli, and Davood Nouri Alavije. 2014. Standards and criteria for designing, planning, building and maintaining mosques in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Tehran: Parhib. [in Persian]
13. Noghrekar, Abdolhamid. 2008. An introduction to Islamic identity in architecture. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. [in Persian].
14. Norberg-Schultz, Christian. 1975. Meaning in Western architecture. Translated by Mehrdad Ghaiomi. 2008. Tehran: Art Academy Press. [in Persian]
15. Raeesi, Mohammad Manan. 2013. Semantics in architectural works for improving mosques designing; Case study: Meaning-making (From geometric and spatial aspects) in contemporary Tehran mosques." PhD Diss. Iran University of Science & Technology. [in Persian]
16. Raeesi, Mohammad Manan, and Abdolhamid Noghrekar.2014. The geometric assessment of contemporary mosques in Tehran using a systematic analysis of religious texts. journal of Islamic Architectural Studies 1(4): 30–46. [in Persian]
17. Rahimi, M. 2012. Requirements of mosque designing. Urmia: Memar Publications. [in Persian]
18. Saheb Mohammadian, Mansour. 2006. Mosque architecture from concept to eample (Designing the mosque of the University Campus of Tehran). MA Thesis. University of Tehran. [in Persian]
19. Shaterian, Reza. 2011. Analysis of Iran's mosques architecture. Tehran: Nopardazan. [in Persian]
20. Tabatabai, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein .1992. Al-mizan fi tafsir al-Quran. Tehran: Ismailian. [in Persian]
21. ———. 1977. Al-mizan fi Tafsir al-Quran. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob Al-Islamiyah. [in Persian]
22. Vasfi, Mohammad Reza. 2008. From understanding of implications to understanding of the mechanism of understanding (from hermeneutics to semiotics). Name-ye Farhang 34: 172–87. [in Persian]
23. Zargar, Akbar, Hamid Nadimi, and Rafone Mokharshahi.2007. A guide for mosque architecture. Tehran: Did Graphic Company. [in Persian] Gibson, J. J. 1976.The theory of affordances and the design of the environment. In Proceedings of Symposium on Perception in Architecture, American Society for Esthetics (Toronto, October 1976). Republished as Chapter 4.9, Part VIII in Reasons for realism: selected essays of James J. Gibson, E. Reed and R. Jones eds. 1982. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb